Serving Clients During COVID-19. Learn More »
Avvo Rating 10 Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Avvo Top Contributor 2015 Criminal Defense
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2017
Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Expertise Best Employment Lawyers in Los Angeles
Expertise Best DUI Lawyers in Orlando

Burglary Basics

Let's talk about burglary in Florida. Every burglary in Florida is made up of three things. First, you've got 'entry' into a structure, dwelling or conveyance. Second, you have entry 'with knowledge that you don't have permission to be there'. And third, you have entry 'with intent to commit some offense while you're there'. Those are the three things that go on in every single burglary.

The title of a burglary crime depends upon what you've entered. So, if you've entered a car, we call that burglary of a conveyance. If you're accused of breaking into a business, for example, that's burglary of a structure. And, a home burglary is called a burglary of a dwelling.

Now, the first part, that you've entered a place, that's a trespass and every burglary has a trespass at its core. That's where it all begins. But the debate really starts with the third element, that you had some intent to commit an offense therein. That's what transforms every trespass into a burglary to begin with. To show you how this works we're going to talk about the real-life case of Gaskin v. State of Florida, 869 So.2d 646 (Fla 3d DCA 2004).

What happened with Gaskin is that he was in jail, chilling, and he decided to escape. He ran from the jail, got away, and broke into a nearby business to hide. He locked himself in, but they caught him rather quickly. So, his Shawshank moment was gone in a flash. It was disappointing, I'm sure, to him. He was convicted of burglary of a structure, the business he was hiding in. And the prosecutors told the jury that you've got to convict him of burglary of this structure because he broke into this business with an intent to escape the jail.

Well, that appeal went up to the higher court (redundant, I suppose) and they threw out Gaskin's conviction. They said no, this is not a burglary because Gaskin already had his Shawshank moment--he escaped from the jail before entering the business. What crime was Gaskin intending to commit in that business? He intended to commit nothing inside of that business. So there was no burglary, this was just a trespass. Hiding after you've already committed an escape is not a burglary. It is a trespass.

Another problem with these burglaries is this term "entry". We attorneys pick on everything and we're going to pick on "entry" too. Because, entry is pretty obvious when somebody breaks down the front door of a home. But, what if they are just rummaging through a back patio? What about a fenced back yard?

And if we're talking about a car, a burglary of a conveyance, if you're accused of stealing the rims off a car--is that burglary of a conveyance? No. Its not. Because, you never went inside the car. You have to enter a car with the intent of taking (stealing) something inside the car. Otherwise, you only have a trespass, if that. So, that's my quick review of burglary basics. I appreciate you watching, have a great day. Take care.

Client Reviews
"I can not express better my gratitude to John Guidry. His customer service exceeded my expectations. He always listened to my needs and my case and he explained in details every options I have and the steps to take. He maintained full communication with me and answered to my calls in less than five minutes. It was worth every single penny. I highly recommend this lawyer." J.P.
"I spoke to a couple of attorney's before speaking to John and I knew right away he was the attorney I would hire. He is very professional and a very caring individual. He is up front about the cost of service, with no surprises. I am in my late 50's and was never in trouble with the law and he made me feel very comfortable and reassured me of a positive outcome.....which it was. I highly recommend The Law Firm of John Guidry II." M.C.
"John Guidry worked closely with my family over a trivial matter. However, he treated it like it was the only case on his plate. He was kind, patient, professional, and just an excellent person to have on our side. While we reached out to him over a year ago, we are still constantly in contact with him. He makes sure there is no question left unanswered and personally reaches out to you himself whenever he possibly can. Very grateful for you, John!" K.P.